![[post_title]](https://samony.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/1767876708_Cristian-Romero-appears-to-criticise-Tottenham-hierarchy-in-edited-Instagram-1024x683.jpg?lm=695FA866)
Recent events have once again brought to the forefront the question of why is Tottenham struggling, particularly after a series of disappointing results and public comments from key players. The club’s recent 3-2 loss at Bournemouth sparked a candid apology from captain Cristian Romero, which quickly escalated into a thinly veiled critique of the Tottenham hierarchy. Romero’s edited Instagram post, where he removed a line about “lies” from “other people” at the club, highlights a deeper sentiment of frustration that resonates with many fans and observers. This incident serves as a crucial lens through which to examine the underlying issues plaguing the North London club’s performance and strategic direction.
What is Tottenham’s hierarchy problem, and how does it contribute to the club’s inconsistent performance? For many years, Tottenham’s leadership structure has been a point of contention, characterized by a perceived lack of transparency and a focus on financial stability over aggressive sporting ambition. Key figures like Daniel Levy, though no longer chairman, have shaped the club’s trajectory, alongside more recent appointments such as chief executive Vinai Venkatesham and co-sporting director Johan Lange. The majority owners, ENIC, run by the Lewis family trust, have also faced scrutiny for their public engagement, or lack thereof, until recently. This layered management often leads to a disconnect between the ambitions of the squad, the manager, and the executive decisions.
Romero’s original post spoke of “many obstacles that always existed and always will exist,” a line he previously used when paying tribute to former manager Ange Postecoglou. This recurring theme suggests a systemic issue rather than isolated incidents. His questioning of “other people” at the club who “only show up when things are going well, to tell a few lies” points to a deeper institutional problem, implying a lack of accountability or communication from those at the top when the team faces adversity. The subsequent edit underscores the sensitivity of these internal critiques.
The core issue often lies in a perceived disconnect between ownership and management and on-field performance, leading to player frustration and fan discontent over strategic direction and accountability. This persistent problem can hinder long-term planning and create an environment where success is hard to sustain.
The impact of recent losses has been significant, contributing to a record of only two wins in 12 Premier League matches. This poor run of form naturally leads to questions about Tottenham’s future vs current form. The inconsistency has become a hallmark of recent seasons, despite significant investment in facilities like the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. The club appears to be caught in a cycle where promising starts are often derailed by internal or external pressures, leaving fans to wonder if structural changes are needed to break free from this pattern.
Tottenham board vs manager dynamics have also played a crucial role in the club’s struggles. Over the past decade, Tottenham has seen a revolving door of highly respected managers, from Mauricio Pochettino to Jose Mourinho, Antonio Conte, and Ange Postecoglou, all of whom ultimately failed to deliver consistent silverware. This suggests that the issues might extend beyond managerial capabilities and into how the board supports and empowers its coaches, particularly concerning transfer strategy and long-term squad building. A stable and supportive relationship between the board and the manager is paramount for sustained success.
Delving deeper into Tottenham club issues explained, several factors emerge. A consistent criticism has been the club’s approach to the transfer market, often characterized by a reluctance to spend big on top-tier talent compared to rivals, or a failure to integrate new signings effectively. Furthermore, the perceived lack of a clear, overarching footballing philosophy from the top down has led to a disjointed approach to squad development and tactical identity. These systemic challenges make it difficult for any manager to build a truly competitive team capable of challenging for major honors year after year.
The Cristian Romero latest news has undoubtedly sent ripples through the club and its fanbase. A player of his caliber, a World Cup winner, speaking out so publicly, even if later softened, indicates a significant level of discontent within the dressing room. Such comments can either galvanize a team for change or expose deeper fractures, depending on how the club hierarchy responds. It puts pressure on the leadership to address the perceived “obstacles” and “other people” issues that Romero highlighted.
Looking ahead, discussions around best Tottenham signings 2026 and Tottenham transfer strategy 2026 become critical. To overcome current difficulties, the club will need a robust and forward-thinking recruitment policy. This includes identifying not just talented players but those who fit a clear tactical vision and possess the leadership qualities needed to thrive under pressure. A proactive approach to transfers, coupled with a willingness to invest significantly in key positions, could be vital for a resurgence. The club’s ability to attract and retain top talent will hinge on demonstrating a clear path to success and stability.
Ultimately, the question of why is Tottenham struggling is multifaceted, encompassing leadership, player morale, strategic planning, and on-field performance. While individual results contribute, the deeper narrative points to systemic issues within the club’s structure and decision-making processes. Addressing these challenges will require more than just managerial changes; it will demand a comprehensive re-evaluation of the club’s long-term vision and a renewed commitment to fostering an environment where both players and staff feel fully supported and accountable.
