The high cost of political forms in Nigeria has become a significant barrier to democratic participation, sparking widespread concern among advocacy groups. Recently, the Ohanaeze Youth Council (OYC) voiced strong disapproval over the exorbitant N30 million charged by the All Progressives Congress (APC) for chairmanship expression of interest forms in the Ebonyi local government elections. This financial hurdle, according to OYC National President Igboayaka O. Igboayaka, effectively sidelines a vast majority of aspiring young leaders, threatening the very essence of inclusive governance and fostering an environment ripe for corruption.
Igboayaka O. Igboayaka, speaking in Abakaliki, emphasized that such steep fees are beyond the reach of most Nigerian youth who possess the zeal and competence to serve at the local government level. The OYC proposed a drastic reduction, suggesting N150,000 for chairmanship forms and N50,000 for councillorship forms. This call for affordability is rooted in the belief that lower fees would cultivate a more competitive and credible electoral landscape, ensuring that merit, rather than financial muscle, determines who gets to lead.
Indeed, the question of how to get youth into Nigerian politics remains pressing when financial gates are so high. The current system inadvertently creates an exclusive club, where only the affluent or those backed by powerful godfathers can vie for positions. This not only discourages genuine grassroots leadership but also deprives the nation of fresh perspectives and innovative solutions that young people often bring to governance. It raises concerns about the future of political engagement among the demographic that represents the majority of the population.
Many observers ponder why are political forms expensive in Nigeria? Several factors contribute to this phenomenon, including the monetization of politics, the desire of political parties to generate revenue, and a deliberate strategy to limit the pool of contestants to those who are already wealthy or well-connected. This trend, while seemingly a party fundraising mechanism, has profound implications for the democratic process, turning public service into a commodity accessible only to a privileged few.
What is the cost of APC chairmanship form? The All Progressives Congress (APC) recently charged N30 million for its chairmanship expression of interest forms in the Ebonyi local government elections. This substantial amount has drawn criticism for potentially excluding qualified but less financially endowed aspirants from participating in the democratic process.
When considering APC vs PDP nomination form cost, historical data often reveals a competitive escalation between the two dominant parties, each vying to out-price the other or set a benchmark for entry. While specific figures fluctuate with each election cycle and position, the general trend indicates high costs across the board. This financial arms race between parties further solidifies the perception that Nigerian politics is an arena for the rich, rather than a platform for public service.
The OYC’s concern that high fees lead to corruption is a widely shared sentiment. If individuals pay exorbitant amounts to secure a local government chairmanship, the inclination to embezzle public funds to recoup their investment becomes a significant risk. This creates a vicious cycle where public office is seen as an investment opportunity rather than a call to serve, undermining public trust and perpetuating systemic graft. It highlights the urgent need for youth participation vs money in Nigerian politics.
A comprehensive Nigerian political reform guide must address the issue of election financing. Implementing reasonable caps on nomination fees, increasing transparency in party funding, and strengthening regulatory oversight are crucial steps. Such reforms would not only level the playing field for aspiring politicians but also enhance the credibility of the electoral process, making it more reflective of the people’s will.
In a recent Ebonyi LG election update, it was noted that Osborne Umah, the 27-year-old son of the Minister of Works, Engr Dave Umahi, had already purchased an APC chairmanship form for Ohaozara LGA. This instance, while not unique, underscores the existing disparity and the challenge faced by ordinary citizens in a system where political power often aligns with inherited influence or substantial personal wealth. This context further fuels the debate around the accessibility of political office.
Looking ahead, strategies for youth in politics 2026 must focus on empowering young people through alternative funding models, robust mentorship programs, and strong advocacy for electoral reforms. Encouraging collective fundraising, promoting volunteerism, and leveraging digital platforms for campaigns can help overcome financial barriers. It is imperative to cultivate a political culture where competence and integrity are valued over personal wealth.
The discourse around the cost of election forms Nigeria 2026 will undoubtedly intensify as the next election cycle approaches. Without significant legislative intervention and a concerted effort from political parties to democratize their internal processes, the trend of high nomination fees is likely to persist. This makes the current advocacy by groups like Ohanaeze Youth Council even more critical for shaping future political landscapes.
Ultimately, addressing the high cost of political forms in Nigeria is fundamental to strengthening the nation’s democratic institutions. It is a call to prioritize inclusive governance, empower the youth, and dismantle financial barriers that breed corruption. Only through genuine reform can Nigeria ensure that its political leadership truly represents the aspirations and diversity of its populace, fostering a more equitable and sustainable future.
