![[post_title]](https://samony.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/1766332786_US-intercepts-third-vessel-near-Venezuela-marking-second-seizure-in.png)
The United States has escalated its pressure campaign against Venezuela, intercepting another vessel off the Venezuelan coast, marking the second such operation within a single weekend. This aggressive move signals a tightening of Washington’s enforcement of sanctions against the Nicolás Maduro regime and its state-owned oil company, PDVSA, as President Donald Trump’s administration targets what it terms a “shadow fleet” of tankers. The interceptions underscore a concerted effort to disrupt Venezuela’s oil exports, a primary source of revenue for the embattled government.
This latest seizure follows President Trump’s explicit directive for a “TOTAL AND COMPLETE BLOCKADE OF ALL SANCTIONED OIL TANKERS going into, and out of, Venezuela,” a declaration made publicly just days prior. The broad scope of this order indicates a significant hardening of US policy, moving beyond targeted individual sanctions to a more comprehensive interdiction strategy aimed at severely curtailing Venezuela’s ability to trade its crude oil on international markets. The US administration maintains that these measures are essential to exert economic pressure and counter what it describes as illicit activities funding the Maduro government.
Officials, speaking anonymously to Reuters, confirmed the Sunday interception but refrained from disclosing the vessel’s identity or the precise location of the operation. However, Bloomberg later reported that US forces boarded a Panamanian-flagged oil tanker. This vessel, already under US sanctions, was reportedly en route to Venezuela with the intention of loading crude oil, highlighting the direct enforcement of the blockade against entities attempting to facilitate Venezuelan oil trade.
The weekend’s actions began with a prior seizure by the US Coast Guard of an oil tanker containing sanctioned PDVSA oil. Significantly, this earlier vessel had not appeared on official US sanctions lists, demonstrating a proactive approach to enforcement that extends beyond previously identified entities. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly confirmed the presence of sanctioned oil, underscoring the administration’s resolve to intercept any vessel involved in such transactions, regardless of its prior listing status.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem issued a stark warning following the first seizure, articulating the US commitment to disrupting these illicit oil movements. In a statement posted on social media, Secretary Noem asserted, “The United States will continue to pursue the illicit movement of sanctioned oil that is used to fund narco terrorism in the region. We will find you, and we will stop you.” This powerful rhetoric links Venezuela’s oil trade directly to funding criminal activities, framing the interdictions as a crucial component of broader counter-terrorism and anti-narcotics efforts.
The immediate consequence of these US actions has been a de facto embargo on Venezuelan oil exports. Reports indicate that numerous loaded vessels, collectively carrying millions of barrels of crude, have chosen to remain anchored within Venezuelan territorial waters. Shipowners and operators are evidently unwilling to risk the seizure of their tankers and cargo by US forces, effectively creating a bottleneck in Venezuela’s critical oil supply chain and further isolating the nation from global energy markets.
This intensified US strategy comes amidst a long-standing campaign by Washington to unseat President Maduro, whom it considers an illegitimate leader following disputed elections. The economic sanctions, initially targeting individuals and then expanding to the oil sector, have severely crippled Venezuela’s economy, which relies almost entirely on oil revenues. The latest “blockade” represents a significant escalation in this pressure, raising questions about international maritime law and the sovereignty of nations to conduct trade.
International legal experts frequently debate the legality of such blockades, particularly when not authorized by the United Nations Security Council. While the US cites national security interests and the fight against “narco terrorism,” critics often argue that unilateral interdictions in international waters could set dangerous precedents and potentially exacerbate humanitarian crises within the targeted nation. The implications for global shipping and freedom of navigation are also central to these discussions.
The US administration’s rationale for targeting Venezuela’s oil sector is rooted in its belief that the profits sustain a corrupt regime and enable illicit activities that destabilize the region. By disrupting the “shadow fleet” – a network of older tankers, often operating with obscured ownership and flags of convenience to evade sanctions – Washington aims to cut off the financial lifelines supporting the Maduro government and its allies, thereby increasing pressure for a political transition.
The concerted effort to intercept vessels, coupled with explicit warnings from high-ranking officials, sends a clear message to shipping companies, insurers, and other entities involved in Venezuela’s oil trade: the risks of engaging with sanctioned entities are substantially increasing. This aggressive enforcement could lead to higher costs for Venezuela’s remaining oil customers and further complicate its already dire economic situation, impacting its ability to import essential goods and services.
The long-term effectiveness of this blockade strategy remains to be seen. While it undeniably disrupts Venezuela’s oil exports in the short term, its capacity to fundamentally alter the political landscape in Caracas is subject to ongoing debate. International reactions, particularly from countries that have maintained trade relations with Venezuela, will be crucial in determining the diplomatic fallout and the sustainability of such an assertive US posture in the region.
