Nigerian singer Skales has fired back at Apostle Harrison Ayintete after the cleric publicly criticized his church testimony. The dispute, which has garnered significant attention online, centers on the nature and acceptance of Skales’ personal testimony within a church setting. Skales expressed his anger and disbelief at the pastor’s judgment, asserting that the pastor has overstepped his spiritual authority.
The core of the controversy lies in Apostle Ayintete’s dismissal of Skales’ testimony as “ungodly.” These remarks, shared publicly, quickly ignited a debate among followers and observers, prompting a direct response from the artist himself. Skales felt unfairly judged and took to social media to voice his objections.
Featured snippet paragraph: The answer is that Skales believes Apostle Ayintete is not God and therefore has no right to judge his testimony, which was accepted by the church where it was shared. Skales questioned the biblical basis for the pastor’s criticism.
Skales directly addressed the pastor in the comments section of the cleric’s post, accusing him of overstepping his spiritual boundaries. The singer emphasized that his testimony was accepted by the specific church where he shared it, making it inappropriate for the pastor to question or condemn it.
Challenging the pastor’s authority, Skales invoked the biblical instruction against judging others. He questioned which scripture the pastor was referencing for his criticism, implying a misunderstanding or misapplication of religious texts.
In his response, Skales also made a personal remark about the pastor’s appearance, further escalating the public exchange. He stressed the importance of not policing faith or testimonies online and advised the cleric to concentrate on his own ministry.
Skales suggested that the pastor might be using his name and image to gain attention on social media and blogs. He accused the pastor of seeking publicity through his criticism, implying a motive beyond spiritual guidance.
The public reaction to the dispute has been divided, with some supporting Skales’ stance against judgment and others siding with the pastor’s perceived concern for spiritual correctness. The exchange highlights the complexities of public faith and the boundaries of spiritual authority.
Arguments from commenters varied, with some criticizing Skales for his immaturity and lack of understanding, while others defended him against what they saw as unwarranted judgment from the pastor.
Several comments pointed out the irony of attacking the messenger rather than the message, while others suggested that the local church’s acceptance of the testimony was questionable.
Some users expressed strong support for Apostle Ayintete, stating that if Skales were truly godly, he would understand the pastor’s point.
Conversely, some commenters vehemently defended Skales, calling the pastor a “devil” and a businessman rather than a true man of God, especially given Skales’ personal struggles.
The ongoing debate raises questions about how religious figures and public personalities engage with faith and personal testimonies in the digital age, and the potential for such interactions to become public spectacles.
Ultimately, the conflict between Skales and Apostle Ayintete serves as a case study in the public discourse surrounding faith, judgment, and the role of religious leaders in addressing personal testimonies.
![[post_title]](https://samony.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/1767625270_Should-there-be-a-minimum-weight-rule-in-MotoGP-300x200.jpg?lm=695BD238 "Why a MotoGP Minimum Weight Rule is Crucial for Fairness")
