Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde has publicly declared his withdrawal of support for President Bola Tinubu’s potential re-election bid, a significant shift from his previous tacit alliance. This declaration has ignited a political firestorm, with allegations emerging from both sides regarding the true motivations behind the sudden change in allegiance. The controversy escalated following claims made by Lere Olayinka, a media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, who offered a distinct explanation for Governor Makinde’s altered stance.

Governor Makinde, a prominent figure within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), made his intentions clear during a media interaction with journalists in Ibadan on Tuesday. He firmly stated that he would not be endorsing President Tinubu for a second term, signaling a potential divergence from the political understanding that characterized their relationship during the 2023 general elections. Furthermore, Makinde hinted at the possibility of contesting against the incumbent president, suggesting a more direct challenge in future electoral cycles.

During the same media chat, Governor Makinde leveled serious accusations against FCT Minister Nyesom Wike, alleging that Wike was actively working to destabilize the PDP. Makinde posited that Wike’s actions were orchestrated to pave the way for President Tinubu’s re-election, thereby undermining the opposition party’s cohesion and strategic positioning. This accusation underscores the deep-seated factionalism and power struggles currently plaguing the PDP, a party still grappling with the aftermath of the last presidential election.

In a swift response to Governor Makinde’s assertions, Lere Olayinka, a media aide to Minister Wike, took to social media to present an alternative narrative. Olayinka alleged that Makinde’s decision to distance himself from President Tinubu was not rooted in ideological differences or party loyalty, but rather stemmed from a personal grievance. According to Olayinka, the governor’s shift in support was directly linked to President Tinubu’s purported rejection of Makinde’s nominee for a ministerial position representing Oyo State in the federal cabinet.

Olayinka’s Facebook post explicitly claimed that Governor Makinde would have maintained his public support for President Tinubu if his preferred candidate for the ministerial role had been accepted. This assertion throws light on the transactional nature that often defines political alliances in Nigeria, where appointments and patronage play a crucial role in securing loyalty and cooperation. It suggests that the perceived slight over a cabinet slot may have been the catalyst for the public declaration of non-support.

The political landscape leading up to the 2023 elections saw Governor Makinde, despite being a PDP governor, aligning with the “G5” or “Integrity Group” within his party. This group, led by then-Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike, famously withheld support for the PDP’s presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, and instead offered tacit backing to President Tinubu’s All Progressives Congress (APC) candidacy. Makinde’s strategic positioning was widely seen as instrumental in the APC’s success in Oyo State during the presidential polls.

Ministerial appointments hold immense significance within Nigeria’s political framework, serving not only as avenues for governance but also as critical tools for political patronage and consolidation of power. The selection of cabinet members is often a delicate balancing act, requiring the president to navigate regional interests, party loyalties, and the demands of influential political figures. A perceived snub in this process can, therefore, lead to significant political fallout and realignments, as is now evidently the case with Governor Makinde.

This unfolding political drama highlights the precarious nature of alliances within Nigeria’s multi-party democracy, particularly when personal ambitions and perceived slights intersect with broader party objectives. The public spat between Makinde and Wike’s aide not only exposes the fragility of inter-party and intra-party collaborations but also signals potential shifts in the political calculus for the upcoming electoral cycles. Such disagreements can significantly influence public perception and electoral outcomes.

For the Peoples Democratic Party, the accusations and counter-accusations further exacerbate its ongoing internal struggles. The party has been striving to rebuild unity and present a formidable opposition front since its defeat in the 2023 elections. The public discord involving prominent figures like Governor Makinde and Minister Wike, both influential in their respective regions, risks deepening existing rifts and complicating efforts to forge a united strategy for future political contests.

The implications of Makinde’s withdrawal of support extend beyond party lines, potentially affecting President Tinubu’s efforts to foster a broad-based government of national unity. While Makinde’s initial backing was indirect, it represented a crucial cross-party endorsement from a key South-West governor. The current rift suggests that securing and maintaining political goodwill, even from erstwhile allies, remains a continuous challenge for the presidency in Nigeria’s complex and highly competitive political environment.

Read Original

Keywords: Seyi Makinde, Bola Tinubu, Nyesom Wike, Nigerian politics, Ministerial appointment, Oyo State governor, PDP internal crisis, 2023 general elections