Executive-Legislative Harmony: A Critical Look at Nigeria’s Governance Model

Vice-President Shettima’s recent call for tighter executive-legislative ties sparks a familiar debate: how best to govern Nigeria. These calls for unity often surface, usually framed as essential for national progress. But past experiences demand a measured response. What’s really going on here?

Shettima, addressing the National Assembly at a dinner hosted by First Lady Remi Tinubu, emphasized the need for alignment to build a “Nigeria that works for all citizens.” This sentiment, while laudable, echoes countless pronouncements from previous administrations. The question isn’t whether the goal is worthwhile, but whether the approach truly fosters accountability or risks blurring crucial lines of oversight.

The VP highlighted the number of Tinubu administration figures with legislative backgrounds, from Tinubu himself to key advisors. He sees this shared history as a foundation for understanding and cooperation. Perhaps. Yet, one could argue that this concentration of power within a particular circle might inadvertently stifle dissent or critical evaluation from within the legislature. Groupthink is a real danger.

He painted a picture of unprecedented harmony between the executive and legislative branches since 1999. This assertion needs scrutiny. While open conflict might be less visible, genuine collaboration requires more than just the absence of public squabbles. Are crucial debates happening behind closed doors? Is the legislature truly exercising its power to check the executive, or is it simply rubber-stamping administration policies? It’s worth digging deeper to truly understand the dynamics between both arms of government.

Shettima credited the National Assembly’s cooperation with the administration’s “audacious reforms,” including macroeconomic stabilization and enhanced global competitiveness. He applauded their resistance to “populist shortcuts.” This narrative frames these policies as difficult but necessary medicine. Yet, such reforms often involve significant short-term pain for ordinary citizens. What about the social safety nets, and the programs meant to mitigate the impact of these policies on the most vulnerable? The story shouldn’t be all about attracting foreign investment; it should also focus on protecting the local economy.

National security threats, Shettima stressed, necessitate unity. Surely, a united front against insecurity is essential. But this unity should not come at the expense of transparency and accountability. Oversight is still crucial, especially when dealing with issues as sensitive as defense spending and security operations.

Senate President Akpabio pledged the National Assembly’s unwavering support for the president in addressing security challenges. This pledge, while reassuring, needs to be balanced with the legislature’s duty to independently assess the effectiveness of security strategies and hold those responsible accountable.

Speaker Abbas advocated for greater female representation, particularly in policymaking related to insecurity. This is a welcome call. Evidence suggests that diverse perspectives can lead to more effective and sustainable solutions. Passing the bill on women’s participation would be a step in the right direction.

Governor Uzodimma pushed for more women in government, describing them as capable managers. While laudable, such arguments should not be based on stereotypical gender roles. Women deserve opportunities based on their individual skills and qualifications, not because they are seen as inherently better “managers.”

The dinner itself raises questions. Ostensibly a social event, it underscores the close relationships between the executive and legislative branches. Such gatherings, while potentially fostering camaraderie, also carry the risk of blurring the lines between personal relationships and official duties. Can legislators truly exercise independent judgment when they are socializing regularly with the very people they are supposed to oversee?

It’s important to avoid cynicism. Cooperation between the executive and legislative branches is essential for effective governance. Still, true collaboration requires more than just shared meals and pleasantries. It demands respect for each branch’s constitutional mandate, a commitment to transparency, and a willingness to engage in robust debate, even when it’s uncomfortable.

Nigeria needs strong institutions, not just strong relationships. A healthy democracy thrives on checks and balances, independent oversight, and a vibrant civil society. As Nigeria navigates complex challenges, the focus should be on strengthening these foundations, rather than simply promoting a facade of unity. We must watch closely to see if these calls for collaboration yield tangible benefits for all Nigerians, or simply solidify the status quo. The proof, as always, will be in the pudding. It’s not about how harmonized they say they are, it’s about the actual laws and policies they put forth, and who those policies ultimately benefit.

Read Original

Keywords: Nigeria governance, executive-legislative harmony, Nigerian politics, Shettima, National Assembly, Tinubu administration, accountability, checks and balances