MotoGP Winglets Explained: How Aero Shapes Racing

motorsports

5 minutes ago

By Daniel Jeje

The evolution of winglets in MotoGP represents a significant shift in motorcycle design, transforming from a daring experiment to an integral component. Introduced by Ducati in 2015, these front-mounted wings were initially designed to increase stability under acceleration by generating downforce, helping riders manage powerful machines and prevent wheelies. This allowed for earlier throttle application out of corners, providing a distinct competitive edge. The primary goal of these early winglets was to enhance performance through aerodynamic manipulation. However, their success also sparked controversy and led to their temporary ban due to concerns over rising costs, safety risks from sharp carbon-fibre elements, and the potential for an aerodynamic arms race. The FIM intervened in 2016, leading to a ban on the protruding designs. The shift marked a turning point in how aerodynamics would be approached in the sport. The comeback of aerodynamic elements, starting in the 2017 season, saw a new philosophy emerge: integration rather than add-ons. Rules allowed aerodynamic components only if they were seamlessly integrated into the bodywork, eliminating sharp, protruding parts. This led to the development of complex fairing shapes with internal air channels, often referred to as “aerobodies.” These designs had to be homologated, with a limited number of updates allowed per season, striking a balance between innovation and cost control. This paved the way for the modern era of MotoGP aerodynamics, where multi-stage wings, side guides, diffusers, and even swingarm winglets are used to optimize airflow. The benefits are substantial, including improved stability during braking, smoother high-speed handling, and enhanced acceleration grip. Airflow is meticulously channeled to enhance overall bike controllability throughout all riding phases. However, these advancements come with a significant downside. Many riders argue that while aerodynamics contribute to faster lap times, they can negatively impact the quality of racing itself. The winglets generate intense “dirty air” or turbulent airflow behind the leading rider, making it challenging to follow closely. This disrupted airflow reduces front-end stability and can lead to increased tyre pressure, particularly on the front. Furthermore, reduced cooling from this disrupted airflow can cause dangerous pressure spikes and a drop in grip, making overtakes more difficult. Many participants believe these aero effects detract from the excitement of classic wheel-to-wheel racing. Responding to these concerns, the FIM has introduced major technical changes, particularly concerning aerodynamics, for the 2027 regulations. The aim is to reduce the influence of winglets and fairing design on bike behavior, thereby facilitating closer racing. New rules will limit the maximum front fairing width from 600mm to 550mm, and the foremost point of the nose will be positioned about 50mm further back. The height of rear aero parts will also be reduced by approximately 10cm, with manufacturers only permitted one update per season for this area. These measures are designed to decrease the aerodynamic advantage of large winglets and minimize dirty air. Manufacturers will have less space for prominent wings. Ride-height devices and holeshot systems, which previously manipulated balance and launch performance by temporarily lowering suspension, will be completely banned in 2027. With the advent of these new regulations, racing is expected to rely more heavily on rider skill rather than aerodynamic superiority. Many welcome these changes, anticipating closer battles and fewer issues with overheating front tires, though some remain skeptical about the extent of these aero restrictions. The future of MotoGP racing hinges on finding the right balance between technological advancement and the fundamental excitement of competition. The ongoing debate about the role of aerodynamics in MotoGP highlights the constant push and pull between performance enhancement and the spirit of the sport.

Read Original