EFCC Investigates Malami: A Familiar Pattern in Nigerian Politics?

The news that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has engaged with former Attorney-General Abubakar Malami isn’t exactly earth-shattering. We’ve seen this play out before: a high-profile figure exits office, and suddenly, the anti-corruption spotlight swings their way. Malami himself confirmed the interaction on X, stating he was released and scheduled for more questioning. He frames it as “fabricated allegations” that are soon to be debunked. Color me skeptical.

The EFCC’s official silence on the specifics of their investigation is typical. They rarely publicize details at this stage, and for good reason. Premature disclosures can jeopardize investigations. Still, the lack of transparency fuels speculation. What exactly are they looking into? His tenure was certainly marked by its fair share of controversies.

Malami, for his part, is playing the accountability card. He claims he is fully cooperating and eager to clear his name. This PR move is straight out of the playbook. Publicly professing innocence while privately lawyering up is a well-trodden path in Nigerian politics.

It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first time Malami’s conduct has been questioned. Earlier in his career there were instances that raised ethical concerns. These past issues add another layer of complexity to the current situation.

This brings up a larger point about anti-corruption efforts in Nigeria. The EFCC has secured convictions, absolutely. Yet, the perception persists that these investigations are often politically motivated. Are they genuinely pursuing justice, or are they tools used to settle scores or undermine political opponents? It’s a question that hangs over every high-profile case.

The timing of this investigation is, shall we say, interesting. Malami is no longer in a position of power. This gives the EFCC the latitude to act without the political constraints that might have been in place previously. That being said, many will still view it as a post-power power play.

The real test will be whether the EFCC can present solid, irrefutable evidence. If they can, then this investigation serves its purpose. If it’s based on flimsy evidence or political maneuvering, it further erodes public trust in the system.

I’ve observed these patterns for years. A new administration comes in, promises to fight corruption, and then targets the previous government’s officials. It’s a cycle that leaves many Nigerians cynical. The hope, of course, is that this time is different. The hope is that the process is about justice, and not vengeance.

There’s also the question of what “successful engagement” means. Malami’s interpretation and the EFCC’s might be vastly different. He’s naturally going to portray it in the best possible light. The EFCC won’t comment. So, we’re left to read between the lines.

Looking ahead, several outcomes are possible. The EFCC could drop the investigation due to lack of evidence. They could pursue charges, leading to a protracted legal battle. Or, a compromise could be reached behind the scenes, resulting in a quiet resolution. The latter isn’t unheard of.

Regardless of the outcome, this case highlights the challenges of tackling corruption in Nigeria. It requires more than just arresting and prosecuting individuals. It demands systemic reforms, strengthened institutions, and a genuine commitment to transparency and accountability.

This challenge demands we ask: Is the EFCC genuinely committed to fighting corruption, or is it simply playing a political game? The answer to that question will determine whether this investigation is a step forward or just another chapter in a long and disappointing saga. I believe only time will tell if this is another case of political theater or a genuine attempt at accountability. But for now, I remain cautiously reserved.

Read Original

Keywords: EFCC investigates Malami, Abubakar Malami, Nigerian politics, anti-corruption Nigeria, EFCC investigation, Malami investigation, corruption in Nigeria, political corruption