Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State has publicly revealed a significant political rift with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike. The disagreement stems from Wike’s unilateral declaration of support for President Bola Tinubu’s potential re-election bid in 2027. This contentious statement, made without prior consultation among key Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leaders, occurred during a high-profile meeting attended by President Tinubu, sparking immediate concern within opposition ranks.
Speaking from the Government House in Ibadan, Governor Makinde expressed his surprise and concern when Minister Wike, in the President’s presence, asserted his intention to “hold PDP” for President Tinubu ahead of the 2027 general elections. Makinde recounted directly challenging Wike, questioning the absence of a collective agreement on such a pivotal political commitment. He argued this declaration could profoundly reshape Nigeria’s democratic landscape and the future of the opposition.
Makinde clarified that while he acknowledges Wike’s individual right, his paramount concern is safeguarding Nigeria’s multi-party democracy. He aims to ensure the continued vitality of the PDP as a robust and credible opposition force. Makinde emphasized the critical importance of preventing any perceived drift towards a one-party state, asserting that other party leaders must retain the freedom to pursue distinct political objectives and strategize for future electoral contests without undue influence.
The Oyo State Governor further stated that President Tinubu had not solicited Wike’s public pledge of support, indicating the FCT Minister’s commitment was a voluntary and independent declaration. Efforts by Makinde and other concerned party members to persuade Wike to reconsider his stance proved unsuccessful. This led to a palpable deepening of the political chasm between the two influential PDP figures, highlighting their divergent loyalties and strategic approaches.
Makinde, a prominent member of the G5 governors within the PDP, underscored his independent political trajectory despite their past collective dissent. The G5, notably spearheaded by Wike, had previously opposed the PDP’s presidential ticket in the run-up to the 2023 elections due to concerns over regional alignment. This internal rebellion significantly impacted the party’s performance, with President Tinubu securing victory in Oyo State’s presidential polls despite the state being governed by the PDP.
This historical context, Makinde explained, highlights his consistent stance on internal party democracy and strategic autonomy. He stressed that his current position against supporting President Tinubu’s 2027 re-election is not merely a personal preference. Instead, it represents a principled stand rooted in fundamental concerns about the future trajectory of Nigeria’s democratic landscape and the necessity of a strong, independent opposition.
Governor Makinde reiterated his firm resolve not to support President Tinubu’s re-election in 2027, citing these foundational concerns. He asserted his prerogative to make independent political choices, consciously distinguishing his position from Minister Wike’s. He reaffirmed his unwavering commitment to upholding democratic principles and ensuring the PDP’s enduring relevance and competitive edge in the nation’s political discourse, signaling a clear demarcation within the party’s high echelons.
This public disclosure illuminates intricate internal power struggles and differing political alignments currently at play within Nigeria’s opposition ranks, particularly as strategies for upcoming electoral cycles crystallize. It signals a clear divergence in approaches to engaging with the ruling party. It also underscores the inherent complexities of coalition building, party loyalty, and the delicate balance of power as the 2027 elections steadily draw closer, setting the stage for potential realignments.
The governor’s candid statements reflect a broader sentiment among some opposition figures who staunchly advocate for a vibrant multi-party system. They express apprehension over actions perceived as consolidating power excessively or undermining the opposition’s capacity. His decision to articulate these differences openly sets a definitive tone for his political positioning ahead of the next presidential contest, potentially influencing future alliances, internal party dynamics, and the broader political spectrum.
