Tulsi Gabbard, Kennedy Files, and a CIA Warehouse: What’s Really Going On?

Reports are circulating about a supposed incident involving Tulsi Gabbard, currently serving as Director of National Intelligence (DNI), dispatching a team to a CIA warehouse to seize JFK assassination files. It’s a story that raises eyebrows, and frankly, demands a closer look.

The article points to a covert operation in early April. Apparently, Gabbard’s “hunters,” led by Paul Allen, descended upon a CIA facility, catching the agency off guard. Their stated mission? To retrieve files related to the assassinations of JFK, MLK, and RFK. Adding another layer of intrigue, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, RFK’s daughter-in-law, accompanied the team, allegedly without proper clearance. The documents, after a late-night raid, were purportedly transferred to the National Archives.
>

Gabbard’s office stated this aggressive action stemmed from a shared sentiment that, despite the short timeline for action, too much time had elapsed since Kennedy’s death. The DNI apparently confirmed sending “hunters” to scour FBI and CIA archives in a cabinet meeting, framing it as a quest for truth.

Yet, this narrative, while sensational, needs careful consideration.

One source implies that mounting pressure to comply with a Trump executive order mandating the release of these files actually motivated Gabbard’s actions. The deadline for that order had passed in March, right before the alleged seizure. The White House, predictably, denies any internal divisions over the matter, labeling media reports as distractions. It is worth mentioning Trump himself campaigned on releasing these files, which, according to JFK’s grandson, Jack Schlossberg, was a political ploy using the Kennedy name.
>

On one hand, transparency around these historical events is crucial. The public deserves access to information surrounding these pivotal moments in American history. I can appreciate the desire to accelerate the release of documents that have been shrouded in secrecy for decades.

On the other hand, the manner in which this alleged retrieval occurred raises serious questions. Did proper protocols get observed? Did a lack of coordination or oversight risk mishandling sensitive material? Was this simply a grandstanding move fueled by political ambition? These are important considerations.

Gabbard’s history adds another layer of complexity. She’s always been a figure of contention, even before her appointment as DNI. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, criticized her nomination, citing Gabbard’s past praise for figures like Vladimir Putin and Bashar al-Assad. Others have highlighted her lack of experience in managing large organizations.

Since taking office, it’s been alleged that Gabbard has used her position to pursue agendas favorable to Trump. Demanding access to internal emails, hindering investigations, and propagating conspiracy theories – the accusations paint a picture of an intelligence chief leveraging her authority for political purposes.

It’s necessary to note that the article itself lacks direct quotes from named sources directly involved in the CIA “raid”. It relies on “sources close to the CIA” and “one of the Reuters sources,” which leaves room for interpretation. While these sources could be credible, the absence of on-the-record statements gives me some pause.

This episode highlights a persistent tension between the desire for transparency and the need for responsible handling of classified information. It also reflects the highly polarized political landscape where even seemingly straightforward actions are viewed through a partisan lens. I’ve seen similar patterns before – a rush to judgment, fueled by incomplete information and pre-existing biases.

Ultimately, the truth likely lies somewhere in the gray area. Perhaps Gabbard genuinely believed she was expediting the release of crucial historical documents. Possibly political motivations played a significant role in her actions. Maybe the whole affair is being overblown for political purposes. Whatever the case, the story serves as a reminder to approach sensational claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and to examine the motivations and potential biases of all parties involved. It also underscores the continuous struggle to balance transparency, security, and political agendas within the intelligence community. I find myself wondering what really transpired and what the long-term consequences might be. Only time will tell.

Read Original

Keywords: Tulsi Gabbard, Kennedy files, CIA warehouse, JFK assassination, MLK assassination, RFK assassination, Trump executive order, classified information