AgTech Innovation: How Vive Crop Protection Aims to Revolutionize Sustainable Farming

Vive Crop Protection, a Canadian AgTech firm, recently secured $10 million in funding, sparking renewed interest in the quest for sustainable agriculture. For years, sustainable farming proponents have challenged the reliance on traditional pesticides. These eco-friendly alternatives, while promising, often suffer from higher costs, shorter lifespans, and slower action compared to their conventional counterparts.

So, what if we could empower farmers with “precision chemistry” to dramatically curtail the application of harmful pesticides and fertilizers, all while safeguarding their yields?
>

According to Vive CEO Darren Anderson, technology should be a powerful force for positive change within agriculture. Vive Crop Protection envisions a “development-over-discovery” model, enabling farmers to achieve optimal crop defense with minimal chemical inputs. They’ve also received $2.3 million from the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario) to bolster their expansion efforts.

This latest funding round, with backing from investors like Emmertech, iSelect Fund, BDC Capital, and Farm Credit Canada, underscores the growing confidence in AgTech solutions. FCC emphasized its commitment to supporting ventures that contribute to a more sustainable and productive Canadian food supply.

Vive CTO Douglas Baumann highlighted the potential for enhanced farmer productivity. Farmers could potentially complete their tasks much faster, reducing the amount of time in the field.
>

Precision Chemistry: A New Paradigm for Plant Protection

This increased productivity aligns with broader trends in Canadian agriculture. While the Canadian economy has contracted, agriculture has demonstrated resilience.

Agriculture is a significant employer in Canada and accounts for a considerable portion of the nation’s GDP. Output remains robust despite a decline in the number of farmers, largely due to innovations in machinery, automation, and soil chemistry.

Vive, established in 2006, has cemented its place within Canada’s burgeoning AgTech narrative.

Anderson reiterates his commitment to leveraging technology to minimize agriculture’s environmental impact.

Vive’s core technology, a nanotechnology-based delivery system dubbed Allosperse, emerged from research conducted at the University of Toronto.

This system precisely delivers active ingredients – fungicides, insecticides, and fertilizers – directly to where they are needed, be it on the plant or in the soil. This targeted approach reduces the necessity for repeated applications, minimizes waste, and boosts productivity.

Baumann underscores the importance of keeping fungicides, akin to antibiotics in human medicine, precisely where they are needed on the plant for optimal efficacy.

With seven products already available in the US market, ambitions to extend its reach across 200 million Canadian acres by 2025, and the recent inauguration of its dedicated precision-chemistry lab, the Mississauga-based company exhibits impressive growth.

Vive aims to enhance the persistence and effectiveness of active ingredients, defending them from the elements like wind, rain, and UV degradation.

Baumann uses the analogy of sunscreen losing its protective qualities over time to illustrate the importance of extended effectiveness.

Allosperse also facilitates combinations of substances previously deemed incompatible, like fungicides and fertilizers, according to Vive. This, in turn, saves farmers valuable time while simultaneously decreasing overall chemical usage.

Anderson points out that by focusing on refining existing crop-protection chemistry, Vive simultaneously advances sustainability goals.

He goes on to suggest improvements in effectiveness and efficiency almost invariably generate complimentary sustainability advantages.

In 2023, Vive enlisted Pinion, a consultancy specializing in food and agriculture, to conduct a comprehensive assessment of its sustainability impact.

Pinion scrutinized Vive’s internal data, in addition to over 500 field trials, performing comparisons with industry-standard products.

The study revealed that adopting Vive’s products led to reductions in water usage, reaching up to 20 gallons (76 liters) per acre. Reductions in synthetic active ingredient use averaged 54 percent, and greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 70 percent.

Real-World Implications and Cautious Optimism

So, is this the silver bullet we’ve been waiting for? Maybe, maybe not. The potential for reducing pesticide use is certainly appealing, especially given growing concerns about environmental and health impacts. Yet, we need to consider the practical realities of large-scale implementation. How will these technologies perform across diverse climates and soil types? Will the cost-effectiveness hold up for farmers operating on tight margins? These are questions that require ongoing scrutiny.

I’ve seen similar claims of revolutionary agricultural technologies come and go. The hype often exceeds the real-world impact. This is not to discredit Vive’s work, but rather to inject a dose of healthy skepticism. The data from Pinion’s study is promising, but it’s crucial to replicate these results in varied settings over extended periods. We also need independent verification to ensure objectivity.

The focus on optimizing existing chemistries, rather than developing entirely new ones, seems like a pragmatic approach. It reduces the regulatory hurdles and leverages proven active ingredients. Still, we should be wary of unintended consequences. Could this approach inadvertently extend the lifespan of older, potentially more harmful chemicals?

Ultimately, the success of Vive’s technology hinges on its ability to deliver tangible benefits to farmers – increased yields, reduced input costs, and improved environmental outcomes. It’s a complex equation with many variables, but the potential rewards are substantial. We need to watch closely how this technology evolves and whether it lives up to its ambitious claims. The future of sustainable agriculture might just depend on it.

Read Original

Keywords: