A cargo vessel carrying brake pads for wind turbines, confirmed to contain prohibited asbestos materials, has docked at the port of Geelong, Victoria. This latest incident involves renewable energy giant Vestas, which placed the order with Chinese supplier 3S Industry, and has ignited a strong rebuke from union officials over the continued importation of banned substances into Australia. The discovery marks a significant breach of Australian law, which has outlawed asbestos imports since 2003, raising serious concerns about worker safety and regulatory oversight.

The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) has vehemently condemned the shipment’s arrival, arguing it should never have been permitted entry. Dr. Gerry Ayres, the union’s Victorian–Tasmanian health and safety director, asserted that the ongoing transport of such illegal materials not only contravenes Australian legislation but also places workers in an untenable position, forcing them to handle prohibited goods. The union is demanding immediate and decisive action from authorities to prevent the offloading of the contaminated cargo.

This incident follows revelations in November that three major Australian renewable energy firms, collectively responsible for over 60% of the nation’s wind turbines, had identified asbestos in access lift brake pads sourced from the same Chinese supplier, 3S Industry. Goldwind Australia, Vestas, and Beijing Jingeng Energy International (Australia) were all implicated in the earlier discovery of white asbestos within components, highlighting a systemic issue within the supply chain for renewable energy infrastructure. The recurrence of such imports underscores persistent challenges in ensuring compliance with stringent Australian health and safety standards.

Vestas, the company that ordered the latest consignment, confirmed the shipment was immediately quarantined upon its arrival in Australia. A spokesperson for the firm stated that Vestas maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy regarding asbestos in its purchase specifications and has taken swift action to safeguard worker safety at its wind turbine sites. The company indicated that the supplier, 3S Industry, has accepted responsibility for failing to adhere to Vestas’s policy, and collaborative efforts are underway to mitigate any potential exposure risks.

WorkSafe Victoria has confirmed its ongoing monitoring of the situation, with inspectors and technical experts conducting thorough inquiries to ascertain the necessary course of action. The regulatory body emphasized its commitment to working closely with Victorian duty holders to ensure robust control of associated health and safety risks. This includes facilitating the engagement of licensed asbestos removalists and implementing comprehensive safe removal and replacement programs where required, aiming to prevent any further contamination or exposure.

The CFMEU is intensifying its pressure on regulators, including WorkSafe Victoria and the Australian Border Force, to enforce stricter border controls and prevent any further asbestos-containing components from entering Australian worksites. Dr. Ayres stressed the paramount importance of protecting workers and the broader community from potential exposure, advocating for these components to be immediately returned to their origin. The union contends that current border security measures are insufficient given the known risks associated with these imports.

The repeated discovery of asbestos in critical components for the renewable energy sector raises significant questions about the integrity of international supply chains and the efficacy of current import screening processes. While Australia champions a transition to green energy, these incidents highlight a pressing need for enhanced vigilance and accountability across all stages of project development and material sourcing. The challenge now lies in reconciling sustainable energy goals with uncompromising health and safety mandates.

This situation also brings into sharp focus the legal ramifications for companies found to be importing prohibited materials. The CFMEU has argued that such actions not only break the law but also compel Australian workers to participate in illegal activities by handling contaminated goods. The potential for long-term health consequences from asbestos exposure underscores the urgency for robust enforcement and preventive measures to ensure the safety and well-being of all involved in the renewable energy sector.

Industry experts suggest that the complexity of global supply chains for large-scale infrastructure projects, like wind farms, can sometimes obscure the origins and compositions of individual components. However, Australian law places a clear onus on importers to ensure compliance with national standards. This incident serves as a stark reminder to all companies operating within the country that ignorance of a product’s contents does not absolve them of their legal and ethical responsibilities.

As investigations continue, the spotlight remains on how such materials repeatedly circumvent import regulations. The outcome of WorkSafe’s inquiries and any subsequent enforcement actions will be closely watched by industry stakeholders, unions, and the public. This case is poised to set a precedent for future dealings with international suppliers and could prompt a significant review of current protocols designed to protect Australia from hazardous imports.

Read Original

Keywords: asbestos import Australia, Geelong port asbestos, wind turbine brake pads asbestos, Vestas asbestos, CFMEU WorkSafe Victoria, illegal asbestos shipment, renewable energy supply chain, 3S Industry asbestos