!['Table talks ongoing' - Doris Ogala gives update on face-off with Chris Okafor [VIDEO]](https://samony.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Table-talks-ongoing-Doris-Ogala-gives-update-on-face-off.jpg?lm=694C243B)
Nollywood actress Doris Ogala has publicly rejected an alleged $10,000 settlement offered by Pastor Chris Okafor, founder of the Grace Nation Bible Ministry. The actress made her refusal known through a video shared on her Instagram page, detailing the circumstances surrounding the financial offer and her steadfast refusal to accept its conditions. The development marks a significant turn in the ongoing public dispute between the two prominent figures.
In the video, recorded on December 23, 2025, Ms. Ogala explicitly stated that Pastor Okafor had presented the sum as a settlement, accompanied by a request for her to publicly retract all previous statements she had made against him. She further alleged that the clergyman urged her to falsely claim she had been instigated by other pastors to fabricate allegations against him, a condition she vehemently refused.
Ms. Ogala displayed the two batches of $5,000, which she claimed were given to her on separate occasions – one the previous night and the other on the afternoon of the video recording. She asserted that she deliberately collected the money not as acceptance, but as proof that the pastor had indeed made the offer, reinforcing her earlier claims of his alleged misconduct.
“Chris, you’ve seen me finish ooo, honestly, you have seen me finish,” Ms. Ogala stated in the video, emphasizing her belief that the pastor’s actions were an attempt to undermine her credibility. She stressed that the $10,000 was insignificant to her and that she would not be swayed by financial inducements to compromise her integrity or falsely accuse other religious leaders.
The public spat between Ms. Ogala and Pastor Okafor originated from earlier allegations made by the actress, who claimed the pastor had reneged on a promise of marriage. These accusations initially surfaced after Pastor Okafor reportedly ended their relationship to pursue another woman, prompting Ms. Ogala to publicly call him out on social media platforms.
Prior to this latest development, reports indicated that “table talks and resolution” discussions were underway between the parties, suggesting an attempt to mediate the dispute away from the public eye. However, Ms. Ogala’s latest video strongly suggests that these efforts have failed to yield a mutually acceptable outcome, particularly concerning the conditions attached to the proposed settlement.
Pastor Chris Okafor, a well-known figure in Nigeria’s evangelical landscape, leads the Grace Nation Bible Ministry, a prominent church with a considerable following. Public controversies involving religious leaders and celebrities often attract widespread attention in Nigeria, highlighting the intersections of faith, fame, and personal conduct in the public sphere.
The use of social media as a primary platform for airing personal grievances and making serious allegations has become increasingly common among public figures. This trend allows for direct communication with a vast audience but also places the onus on individuals to present verifiable facts, as such claims can quickly spiral into widespread public debate and scrutiny.
Ms. Ogala’s rejection of the settlement and her public declaration further intensify the ongoing narrative, placing renewed focus on the initial allegations and the pastor’s alleged attempts to silence her. The actress maintained that her statements were truthful and that no amount of money could compel her to retract them or implicate innocent parties.
This incident underscores the complexities of disputes involving high-profile individuals, where personal matters often become subjects of public interest and intense media scrutiny. The actress’s firm stance ensures that the allegations against Pastor Okafor remain at the forefront of public discussion, potentially necessitating a more formal or conclusive response from the clergyman or his ministry.
The public awaits further developments in this unfolding saga, as both parties navigate the implications of these serious claims and counter-claims in the court of public opinion. The resolution of such high-stakes personal and professional disputes often carries significant consequences for the reputations and public standing of those involved.
