Ayo Labinjoh, the mother asserting that Nigerian singer Davido fathered her teenage daughter Anu Adeleke, has escalated her public statements against the artist, bringing forth new allegations and criticisms. The ongoing dispute centers on Davido’s denial of paternity and Labinjoh’s persistent claims, igniting a public conversation about parental responsibility and celebrity accountability.

Labinjoh directly addressed those who have accused her of seeking to establish her daughter’s lineage with Davido solely for financial or social gain. She vehemently denied these accusations, asserting that Davido’s wealth and fame were not the primary motivators when their relationship began. Her core argument is that the connection predates his current level of stardom, suggesting a genuine personal history rather than a calculated pursuit of fortune.

Featured snippet paragraph: What is the core of Ayo Labinjoh’s argument against Davido’s paternity denial? Labinjoh insists that Davido was not as rich or famous when they met in 2013, and she alleges he sent her money on the day of their child’s naming ceremony, suggesting a prior acknowledgment of their connection.

She further detailed her interactions with Davido, claiming he was aware of their past intimacy. A significant part of her recent statements involves an allegation that Davido sent her financial support on the very day of their child’s naming ceremony, an event that occurred in November 2013, according to her account.

Regarding the multiple DNA tests Davido claims to have conducted to disprove paternity, Labinjoh offered a counter-narrative. Instead of acknowledging the tests as conclusive evidence of non-paternity, she re-contextualized them, listing other children Davido has with different women as the alleged five DNA tests he has undergone.

In a direct address, Labinjoh stated, “Davido was not super rich when I met him. Only knew him as an upcoming/fast rising singer in February 2013 Dami Duro concert afterparty in Ibadan and a son of a businessman.” This statement aims to establish a timeline and context for their relationship that predates his massive global success.

She also turned her attention to media personality Daddy Freeze, who conducted a live video to support Davido’s stance. Labinjoh accused Daddy Freeze of attempting to launder Davido’s image rather than encouraging an independent and impartial investigation into the paternity claim.

Labinjoh expressed her disappointment that even Dele Momodu, who is reportedly close to the Adeleke family and has a connection to another of Davido’s children, Imade, has not intervened in the matter. She suggested that such interventions are often absent when children are facing neglect or mistreatment.

“David, YOU and I are the only ones who know who I slept with in February 2013,” Labinjoh declared, emphasizing the private nature of their alleged past. She questioned whether he had informed the public about the financial assistance she claims he provided on the naming ceremony day.

She continued to press her point, asking, “Have you told the world on November 9th 2025 someone initiated a video call from your phone line with the name Adeleke on Truecaller?” This question implies ongoing communication or attempts at contact from Davido’s side.

Labinjoh directly confronted Davido’s perceived maturity and paternal role, stating, “You are a boy NOT a man. You are a dad NOT a father.” This is a strong indictment of his character and his responsibilities as a parent.

She then provided a list of what she claims are the five DNA test dates associated with Davido’s children, including Anu Adeleke in September 2014, Imade Adeleke in June 2015, Hailey Adeleke in May 2017, Dawson Adeleke in June 2021, and Ivanna Bayy in June 2023 (noted as in-utero and Terminated).

Labinjoh concluded by stating her reliance on her faith and a specific organization, @usinnigeria, for strength and support in this ongoing public dispute.

This situation highlights the complexities of celebrity paternity disputes and the public’s interest in the personal lives of prominent figures. The allegations and counter-allegations continue to generate significant discussion online and in media circles.

Understanding the nuances of these public disputes requires looking beyond the initial headlines to the specific claims and counter-claims made by the parties involved. The legal and social implications of such cases can be profound for all involved, especially the children at the center of the controversy.

This ongoing narrative serves as a case study in how public figures navigate paternity issues and the role of social media in amplifying such personal conflicts. The emotional and financial stakes are undeniably high for everyone involved, making each new statement a point of intense scrutiny.

Keywords: davido paternity denial, ayo labinjoh davido, what is davido paternity dispute, davido vs ayo labinjoh, best celebrity paternity cases, davido for beginners, davido news today, ayo labinjoh news, best celebrity paternity cases 2026, davido paternity guide 2026