Nigerian Afrobeats star David Adeleke, widely known as Davido, has broken his silence following allegations from a supposed 13-year-old daughter, Anu Adeleke, who publicly requested a DNA test. This situation has garnered significant attention, with many seeking to understand the full story behind these claims and Davido’s response. The initial appeal came via an Instagram post where Anu detailed years of bullying and emotional distress stemming from the belief that Davido is her father. She described a childhood filled with tears and taunts from classmates, leading to a direct plea for a DNA test from the singer as she entered young adulthood.
Davido addressed the situation on X, formerly Twitter, in a series of posts. He stated, “After 5 DNA test … she Dey crase .. her and her mom better leave me the fk alone and go find her papa …” This strong reaction from the artist has intensified public interest and speculation surrounding the paternity claims. The singer also responded to a user who questioned if he knew the mother, writing, “Never met the bch … except when I went For the DNA … very stupid behavior I will soon treat their FK … 5 fking hospitals just to be clear .. the mom needs to go to jail … I don’t blame the poor girl ..”
Featured snippet paragraph: The answer to whether Davido has confirmed paternity of the alleged teen daughter is no; he claims to have undergone five DNA tests which reportedly all came back negative, and asserts he has never met the child’s mother outside of the DNA testing process. He has expressed his intention to take further action regarding the situation.
Davido emphasized the thoroughness of the testing he claims to have undertaken. He clarified, “Yes I chose 3 hospitals and they chose their own two hospitals .. all came out Negative .. this is the last time I’m speaking on this nonsense.” This detailed explanation aims to underscore the conclusive nature of the tests from his perspective, despite the ongoing public discourse.
This is not the first time paternity questions have arisen. Previous reports from 2025 indicated that at least two DNA tests had been conducted. At that time, it was stated by his then-lawyer, Prince Bobo Ajudua, that one test, selected by the mother’s side, confirmed Davido was not the biological father.
Anu’s mother, Ayo Grace Labinjo, has consistently disputed these previous results. She has alleged that the tests were manipulated and that undue influence was exerted, which has led to her continued belief and public assertion of Davido’s paternity.
The public appeal by Anu, detailing her experiences with bullying and the emotional toll it has taken, adds a layer of complexity to the situation. Her account highlights the personal impact of such allegations, particularly on a young individual navigating their formative years.
Davido’s response, while firm, also touches upon the alleged actions of the mother, suggesting a belief that she is orchestrating or exacerbating the situation. His comment about the mother needing to go to jail indicates the severity of his stance and his perception of her involvement.
The narrative surrounding this alleged paternity case is multifaceted, involving public figures, legal implications, and the emotional well-being of individuals involved, particularly the child.
Understanding the timeline of events, including past DNA tests and the current claims, is crucial for a comprehensive view of this unfolding story.
As the situation continues to develop, public opinion remains divided, with many weighing the artist’s statements against the claims made by the alleged daughter and her mother.
This case raises important questions about public scrutiny, celebrity paternity, and the legal and social ramifications of such allegations.
Further updates are expected as this story progresses, with many keen to see how Davido and the mother of the alleged daughter will proceed.
