The ongoing political turmoil in Rivers State has reached a critical juncture, with the All Progressives Congress (APC) chapter in the state demanding the immediate resignation of its National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Felix Morka. This dramatic call stems from what the Rivers APC describes as Morka’s “reckless and misleading comments” regarding the state’s political crisis, comments which have significantly deepened internal party divisions. To fully grasp the gravity of the situation, understanding the nuances of the Rivers APC crisis explained is paramount, as it highlights deep-seated disagreements over leadership and adherence to legal pronouncements.
Why is Felix Morka asked to resign from his influential national role? The demand for his resignation by the Rivers State APC, articulated by its spokesperson Darlington Nwauju, centers on Morka’s recent remarks on national television. Nwauju vehemently criticized these statements, labeling them an “open endorsement of legislative overreach” and an “attempted coup” by certain members of the Rivers State House of Assembly against Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Odu. Such public utterances, according to the state chapter, directly undermine the party’s stance and internal cohesion.
What is the Rivers APC crisis? The Rivers APC crisis is an internal party conflict characterized by a dispute over legitimate leadership, disregard for court orders, and public disagreements between state and national party figures, notably involving Felix Morka and Darlington Nwauju, concerning the political landscape and governance in Rivers State.
The escalating public spat between Darlington Nwauju vs Felix Morka has brought to light the deep fissures within the APC’s national and state structures. Nwauju, speaking for the Rivers APC, described Morka’s comments as not only “embarrassing” but also “factually flawed,” especially when Morka expressed uncertainty regarding Nwauju’s role in the current Rivers APC leadership. This public doubt cast by a national officer on a state spokesperson further inflamed tensions and questioned the legitimacy of statements issued on behalf of the party in Rivers State.
The underlying conflict often appears as a stark Rivers APC vs National APC ideological and procedural battle. Nwauju meticulously cited subsisting judgments in Suit No. PHC/3592/CS/2023 (Sam Sam Etetegwung v APC) and Suit No. PHC/3859/CS/2024 (OkwuJoe Brown Ndke v APC). These landmark rulings, he emphasized, had effectively nullified the dissolution of the APC executives elected on October 16, 2021, and simultaneously invalidated the November 2023 congress that was convened with the aim of replacing them. These legal precedents, Nwauju argued, firmly uphold his legitimate status as the party’s lawful spokesperson in Rivers State.
For anyone seeking a comprehensive Rivers State political crisis guide, understanding the implications of these court orders is crucial. Nwauju accused Morka of persistently ridiculing and disregarding these lawful judicial pronouncements. Such actions, he asserted, cast significant doubt on the credibility and authenticity of any statements issued by the nationally recognized party leadership concerning Rivers State affairs. The integrity of the party’s internal processes and its respect for the rule of law are now openly questioned.
In the Rivers APC latest news, the state chapter expressed profound alarm at what it perceives as Morka’s continuous disregard for lawful court rulings. This persistent defiance, they argue, places a massive question mark on the legitimacy of opinions and comments published by the legally recognized Party Spokesperson in Rivers State, Darlington Nwauju. The state chapter’s call for Morka’s disbarment is a direct consequence of these legal battles and his perceived undermining of the court’s authority.
A significant Governor Fubara news update embedded within this crisis is the accusation that Morka’s actions attempt to “launder the image of a non-party actor” while simultaneously undermining a sitting APC governor. The Rivers APC firmly describes Governor Fubara as the undisputed leader of the party in Rivers State. This assertion highlights the deep ideological chasm between the state and national factions, with the state chapter urging the National Working Committee to intervene decisively to prevent further division and erosion of internal democracy within the APC.
While looking towards a Rivers State election guide 2026, Nwauju warned that such misleading narratives and internal disunity are too dangerous to be ignored by any genuine party member who desires to see the APC mobilize effectively and win elections fairly in Rivers State for the President. He suggested that Morka should have maintained silence rather than using his national platform to promote individuals outside the party while undermining the standing of a legitimate APC governor.
For those making APC Nigeria predictions 2026, the current events in Rivers State serve as a critical indicator of potential future challenges. Nwauju underscored the National Working Committee’s role as the conscience of the party, stressing that it must not tolerate individuals who actively promote divisiveness over internal party cohesion. He explicitly warned that any steps taken by individuals purportedly “elected” into the Rivers APC leadership through the “sham congresses” conducted in November 2023 under Alhaji Umar Ganduje, represent a direct challenge to the courts’ authority.
The structures emerging from such a flawed and unlawful process, Nwauju maintained, are devoid of legitimacy and are unlikely to withstand judicial scrutiny. He implored the National Chairman and Secretary not to allow the unfortunate events that plagued Rivers APC in 2019 to recur. The state chapter also called attention to what it described as “surreptitious plots” to attack the State Publicity Secretary for his principled stance, asserting that threats to personal safety would not deter them from upholding the truth. This comprehensive overview of the Rivers APC crisis explained reveals a party grappling with profound internal strife and a struggle for judicial respect and legitimate leadership.
