![[post_title]](https://samony.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/1766561982_I-want-a-free-pass-to-bonk-my-wild-ex-lover-1024x538.jpeg?lm=694B98C0)
A man in a long-term relationship faces a profound ethical dilemma as his former lover, with whom he shared an intense connection, is back in town for a brief period before moving to New Zealand permanently. This unexpected return has prompted him to consider a final intimate encounter, raising complex questions about loyalty, honesty, and the boundaries of commitment within his current partnership. The situation highlights the challenges individuals face when past passions collide with present obligations, forcing a difficult choice with potentially significant repercussions.
The individual, whose identity remains anonymous, detailed a passionate history with the ex-lover dating back to 2019. Their initial meeting at a networking event quickly escalated into a three-day intense liaison, described as having “off the scale” sexual chemistry. This period was followed by a series of “wild dates” before she relocated to America. Her current visit to see family over the holiday period represents a fleeting opportunity for a final reunion before her permanent move abroad with her American partner.
Currently involved in a long-term relationship, the man admits to a powerful resurgence of feelings and physical desire for his ex. He grapples with the idea of a clandestine meeting, acknowledging the need for deception, or, more controversially, seeking explicit permission from his current girlfriend for a “free pass.” This desire for an “above board” encounter, he explains, stems from a wish to avoid guilt and recrimination, especially after what he describes as a personally challenging year.
The man articulates a belief that he “deserves a treat” following job and family stresses, positioning the potential encounter as a form of personal reward. He acknowledges the unprecedented nature of such a request within his current relationship, where discussions about non-monogamy or open arrangements have never occurred. This lack of prior dialogue underscores the significant leap he contemplates, moving from private fantasy to a direct proposition that could redefine his relationship’s foundation.
Relationship experts caution against such a proposition, highlighting the vast difference between a secret affair and an openly requested “sex pass.” They emphasize that broaching the subject of a temporary open relationship, particularly under these circumstances, could inflict profound emotional damage. The sudden introduction of such a concept, especially when fueled by a past emotional and physical connection, risks undermining the trust and security of the existing partnership.
Experts predict that a request for a “free pass” would likely be met with feelings of insult and devastation by the long-term girlfriend. Such a revelation could lead her to question the authenticity of their entire relationship, including past intimate moments. The implication that her partner has harbored long-standing fantasies or desires for another woman could erode her sense of worth and security within the relationship, leading to profound emotional distress.
Furthermore, advisors stress the importance of considering the current partner’s feelings and contributions to the relationship. They argue that the girlfriend “deserves better” than to be subjected to such a request, especially when it stems from a partner’s unaddressed emotional attachment to a former lover. The intense, almost “worshipful” language used to describe the ex-lover by the man suggests a deeper emotional connection that could complicate any “one-off” arrangement.
The potential for a single intimate encounter to escalate into a full-blown affair is also a significant concern raised by experts. Given the man’s admitted strong feelings and the ex-lover’s imminent departure, there is a risk that the emotional intensity of a reunion could lead to unforeseen complications. This could jeopardise the ex-lover’s own relationship and, critically, prevent her planned move to New Zealand, creating further entanglement.
Ultimately, the dilemma forces the man to confront fundamental questions about his commitment to his current partner and the type of relationship he truly desires. Relationship advisors unequivocally urge him to abandon the idea of a “dangerous fling” and instead engage in serious introspection. They underscore that individuals cannot “mess people around,” advocating for clear communication, honesty, and a decisive choice regarding the future of his long-term relationship.
This complex scenario serves as a stark reminder of the intricate interplay between past attachments and present commitments. It highlights the ethical boundaries that define exclusive relationships and the potential for perceived “last chances” to destabilize established bonds. The narrative underscores the personal responsibility inherent in navigating such intense emotional crosscurrents, particularly when the feelings and trust of another individual are at stake.
