A new report reveals that most American workers are significantly under-contributing to their retirement plans, falling short of recommended savings targets across all age groups. Data from J.P. Morgan’s 2025 “Retirement by the Numbers” report indicates that average contribution rates hover well below the commonly advised 10% of salary, raising concerns about long-term financial security for millions. This shortfall persists despite the critical role workplace plans play in securing post-career financial stability.

Generational analysis within the report highlights a consistent pattern of insufficient savings. Gen Z workers contribute approximately 3.7% of their salary to workplace plans, while Millennials average 5.0%. Generation X contributes around 6.0%, and even Baby Boomers, nearing retirement, contribute just over 7%. These figures underscore a pervasive trend where individuals are not allocating enough funds to adequately prepare for their retirement years.

Experts emphasize that these seemingly modest contribution choices hold profound implications for long-term retirement readiness. Defined contribution plans, such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and 457 plans, serve as the primary savings vehicle for many Americans. However, a lack of transparency regarding peer contribution rates often leaves individuals without a clear benchmark, making it challenging to assess whether they are truly on track for their financial goals.

While income plays a role in savings habits, it does not entirely bridge the gap. Higher earners generally contribute more, yet even among top earners approaching retirement, average rates remain below 9%. This suggests that even those with greater financial capacity often fail to meet the 10% or higher recommendation. Employer match programs, which typically add about 3.2% of pay, provide a crucial boost but are frequently insufficient to bring total savings rates to ambitious targets, such as Fidelity’s suggested combined rate of 15%.

The report’s findings reveal a stark reality: only 15% of participants in J.P. Morgan’s research achieve the recommended 10% contribution rate. Even within the high-earning demographic, only 22% manage to save at a double-digit rate. This widespread under-saving suggests a collective challenge in prioritizing future financial well-being, often influenced by immediate budgetary constraints or a misunderstanding of long-term compounding benefits.

One of the most compelling insights from the “Retirement by the Numbers” report is the transformative impact of even minor adjustments made early in a career. J.P. Morgan’s models illustrate that a worker who increases their contribution rate by just one percentage point in their mid-20s—moving from 5% to 8% over three years—could accumulate an estimated $84,000 more by retirement than someone who maintains a static rate. This significant difference is largely attributable to the extended period over which compounding interest can work its effect.

Conversely, the report underscores the cost of delayed action. Implementing the same one-percentage-point increase later in a career, specifically during the last 20 years of work, yields a substantially smaller benefit. Projections estimate an additional $22,000 in the final balance, a fraction of the gains achieved by earlier contributions. This disparity highlights the critical importance of early and consistent savings habits in building a robust retirement fund.

For individuals whose contributions fall below these benchmarks, experts advise a strategic approach. Beginning with a small, manageable increase, such as one percentage point, often proves more sustainable than a larger jump and still yields meaningful long-term benefits. Many workplace plans offer automation features, allowing participants to schedule annual increases, which gradually boosts contributions as income grows. Additionally, ensuring the full capture of any employer match program is paramount, as these funds enhance total savings without directly increasing out-of-pocket costs. Steady, incremental progress, rather than an immediate overhaul, remains the most effective path toward a more secure retirement future.

Read Original