AI in Game Development: Transparency or Stigma? A Look at Steam’s AI Disclosure Policy

Steam’s move to require game developers to disclose the use of generative AI has stirred debate. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney argues that these “Made with AI” tags are becoming meaningless, suggesting AI’s integration is inevitable and labeling it is akin to flagging games for using 3D graphics. But is it really that simple?

On the surface, Sweeney’s position has some appeal. AI is weaving its way into countless aspects of development, from basic coding assistance to generating placeholder assets. Labeling every instance might seem excessive, even burdensome, especially for smaller studios that might rely on these tools to compete. It’s easy to envision a future where AI is so deeply ingrained that singling it out becomes a pointless exercise.
>

Still, let’s not dismiss the counterargument. Many players, developers, and even storefronts find value in knowing how a game is crafted, especially in the age of readily available AI tools. This transparency enables informed purchasing decisions. Perhaps labeling isn’t about demonizing AI, but rather about empowering consumers with information.

I’ve seen firsthand how AI-generated content can sometimes fall short. Remember Steam’s Next Fest? Some games showcased AI assets that lacked polish, like character portraits with extra fingers or dialogue that sounded oddly generic. Players noticed, and some developers faced scrutiny for relying too heavily on AI-generated elements without adding their own unique creative input.

It begs the question: are we talking about ethical use of AI or simply churning out “AI-slop,” as some critics put it?
>

Sweeney’s concern for smaller developers also resonates. He suggests that these AI tags stigmatize indie games that utilize these tools responsibly. It’s a valid point. No one wants to punish a solo developer for using Midjourney to concept background art or leveraging ChatGPT for quest brainstorming.

That said, players also don’t want to feel misled into buying a game that’s essentially outsourced its creative core to a neural network. This is where Steam’s disclosure policy offers a crucial middle ground.

The issue here runs deeper than just AI; it’s about trust. Steam’s approach gives players the option to care. Perhaps you’re not concerned. Maybe you just want a relaxing game to unwind with. But for those who do – artists worried about their work being scraped, or players who simply want to support human-made creations – the AI tag acts as a valuable filter. It’s not a mark of shame; it’s a signal.

Eliminating AI tags, as Sweeney advocates, leaves players guessing. It also removes a vital mechanism for accountability. The current policy merely asks developers to be upfront about using AI-generated assets. This is not censorship; it’s disclosure.

Furthermore, not all AI content carries the same weight. A developer who uses AI to brainstorm game mechanics and then painstakingly refines them over months stands apart from someone who simply instructs a text-to-game engine to create a vampire dating sim and publishes whatever results. While the “Made with AI” tag might not capture this nuance, it does invite further inquiry. It prompts the crucial question, “How was AI used in this game?”

The industry is at a crossroads. AI’s role in game development is expanding rapidly, and we need to find a way to embrace its potential while safeguarding artistic integrity and consumer trust. Steam’s disclosure policy isn’t perfect, but it’s a step in the right direction. Instead of dismantling it, perhaps the focus should be on refining it, creating a system that accurately reflects the diverse ways AI is used and empowers players to make informed choices.

One possible refinement would be categorizing the level of AI use. Distinguishing between light assistance and heavy reliance. This would avoid penalizing small game developers ethically using AI to compete in a crowded market.

In any case, simply removing the tag solves nothing. It sweeps the problem under the rug and erodes transparency. The discussion about AI in games is complex and multi-layered. We need to proceed with caution, prioritizing both innovation and ethical responsibility.

Read Original

Keywords: AI in game development, Steam AI disclosure policy, generative AI games, ethical AI game development, AI game assets, AI indie games, transparency in games, AI stigma games