Nigeria’s FATF Delisting: A Win, But What Does It Really Mean?

Nigeria’s recent removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) “grey list” is garnering significant praise. Claims are circulating that this development safeguards the nation from a potential $30 billion investment shortfall and boosts investor confidence. But is this optimism entirely warranted? Having observed similar situations in other emerging markets, a degree of caution is advisable.

The news itself is positive, undeniably. Nigeria landed on the FATF’s watch list in February 2023, flagged for shortcomings in its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) protocols. After implementing a reported 19-point action plan, culminating in an on-site FATF visit, Nigeria secured its delisting at a Paris plenary session.
>

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Olayemi Cardoso, rightly framed this as a significant accomplishment. He noted that grey-listing often leads to a substantial decline in capital inflows – roughly 7.6% of GDP in the first year, which translates to a hefty sum for Nigeria. Getting off the list, in theory, should unlock investment and simplify international financial dealings. President Tinubu himself has celebrated this as a key stride in economic reform and rebuilding global trust.

Yet, the devil often resides in the details. The CBN highlights the reforms undertaken, encompassing enhanced financial institution supervision, improved reporting on suspicious transactions, and deeper intelligence sharing. Tools like the Electronic Financial Evaluation Monitoring System (EFEMS) and the Forex Code were supposedly instrumental in bolstering oversight and transparency.

This is where my skepticism surfaces. While these initiatives sound promising on paper, the true test lies in their sustained implementation and effectiveness. Do these systems genuinely plug the loopholes that allowed illicit financial flows in the first place? Are reporting standards consistently upheld across all institutions? Is intelligence sharing genuinely seamless and proactive? These are questions that demand continuous scrutiny, not just a one-time fix for FATF review.
>

It’s worth dwelling on the reported $30 billion figure. While a potential loss of investment is certainly concerning, attributing a specific dollar amount to the grey-listing is tricky. Investment decisions are influenced by a multitude of factors – political stability, infrastructure, regulatory environment, commodity prices, and overall economic outlook, to name a few. Attributing any change in investment solely to FATF status seems overly simplistic.

Still, Nigeria’s improved standing with FATF presents a valuable opportunity. Foreign investors, particularly those risk-averse institutions, will likely view Nigeria with renewed interest. Correspondent banking relationships, often strained by grey-listing, may ease, facilitating international trade and payments.

However, complacency would be a grave mistake. Nigeria needs to view this delisting not as the finish line, but as a starting point. The country should consistently strengthen its AML/CTF framework and adapt to evolving threats. This means ongoing training for regulatory personnel, investment in cutting-edge technology, and robust collaboration between government agencies.

Given these facts, a few concrete steps could solidify Nigeria’s position. First, focus on proactive enforcement rather than reactive compliance. Investigating and prosecuting financial crimes sends a strong message to deter illicit activity. Second, prioritize transparency and accountability across all government dealings. Reducing corruption is a cornerstone of AML/CTF efforts. Third, engage actively with the international community to share best practices and learn from other nations.

To that end, celebrating this win is justifiable, but now comes the tougher part: sustaining the progress. Nigeria must prove that it is genuinely committed to combating money laundering and terrorism financing, not simply ticking boxes to appease international bodies. The long-term benefits – sustained investment, improved financial stability, and enhanced global reputation – hinge on this commitment. The exit from the FATF grey list provides a platform. It’s up to Nigeria to build something solid upon it. The stakes are high and Nigeria’s financial credibility needs continuous nurturing. This challenge requires continuous vigilance, proactive measures, and a steadfast commitment to transparency.

Read Original

Keywords: Nigeria FATF delisting, Nigeria AMLCTF, Nigeria investment, FATF grey list, Nigeria financial crime, Nigeria economic reform, Nigeria CBN, Counter-terrorism financing