Mahmood Yakubu’s Nomination: A Critical Look at Nigerian Electoral Integrity

President Tinubu’s recent nomination of Professor Mahmood Yakubu, the immediate past Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), as an ambassador has stirred significant debate. Barely two years have elapsed since Yakubu oversaw the election that brought Tinubu’s administration to power. This action, while perhaps legally permissible, raises crucial questions about ethics, public trust, and the long-term health of Nigeria’s democracy.

The core issue? Perception. In a nation where electoral processes already face skepticism, optics are paramount. Even without a formal legal restriction on post-tenure appointments, certain positions demand a higher standard of ethical conduct. The head of the electoral commission undoubtedly falls into that category. Think of it this way: you wouldn’t expect a judge to immediately join the legal team of a defendant they just presided over, irrespective of legality.

The most immediate casualty is public trust. It creates a narrative, regardless of its validity, that compromises the integrity of INEC, and therefore, the perceived legitimacy of the current administration. The nomination risks becoming a self-inflicted wound. There’s a deeper problem, too. Democratic institutions thrive on credibility, not just on expedient decisions. INEC’s strength rests on the public’s belief in its impartiality. To see the person who presided over a pivotal election so quickly rewarded with an ambassadorial post fuels the narrative that the electoral process may have been compromised. The timing is particularly troubling. While past INEC officials might have entered government roles eventually, the speed and directness of this appointment are unprecedented. This immediacy turns what might have been a regular career change into a suspect political move. One cannot ignore the potential signaling this sends to future INEC heads. What’s to prevent them from viewing elections as stepping stones to personal career advancement within the government? The implications are unsettling; neutrality crumbles.

Moreover, consider the millions of Nigerians who invested their time, energy, and faith in the electoral system. They braved long queues, security risks, and general challenges to participate. This nomination, in some ways, feels like a disregard for their participation, a validation of their fears that the system is rigged. From my observations, it’s these kinds of actions that fuel cynicism and disengagement from the political process.

Professor Yakubu faces a pivotal choice that will dictate his legacy. Accepting the ambassadorial role risks confirming the worst suspicions surrounding his tenure. It forever taints his reputation. On the other hand, declining the nomination offers an opportunity to salvage some of his standing and demonstrate a commitment to ethical principles.

Declining isn’t just about personal reputation; it’s about safeguarding the integrity of INEC itself. The electoral body cannot become a mere recruitment ground for the ruling party. Yakubu owes it to the institution he once led to protect it from such perceptions. This is about more than just what’s allowed, but also what is truly right. It’s a chance to underscore the importance of ethical boundaries in public service, which is in increasingly short supply.

Ultimately, Yakubu’s choice carries broader implications for Nigeria’s democratic development. The country needs leaders who are willing to place national interest and public trust above personal gain. This moment presents precisely such an opportunity. A leader willing to uphold the integrity of the political process when faced with personal and professional gain.

Nigerians are not oblivious to the complexities of their political system. But this nomination strikes a particularly discordant note. It comes across as insensitive to the persistent calls for more transparent and credible elections. It deepens existing wounds.

If Nigeria is to truly strengthen its democratic institutions, such actions must be met with resistance, scrutiny, and disapproval. A course of action is available: Professor Yakubu should reject the appointment.

Read Original

Keywords: Mahmood Yakubu, INEC, Nigerian elections, electoral integrity, Tinubu nomination, public trust, ethical conduct, democratic institutions